Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Canada Immigration and Inadmissible Family Members


Most applicants are shocked to discover that if any family member is inadmissible - whether accompanying you to Canada or not - then the applicant is inadmissible as well.

This is certainly one of the least understandable of immigration rules. If your family member will not accompany you to Canada, then why should it matter if that family member has a medical condition or criminal record that keeps them out of Canada?

I believe the answer lies in the fact that once you become a permanent resident, you do have certain rights to sponsor family members, and can even try a humanitarian and compassionate application as a last ditch effort in most circumstances.

The legislation is circumventing those processes by ensuring that the applicant never becomes a permanent resident in the first place. Whatever the reason, it is a harsh rule and I think it is ripe for re-evaluation.

Here is a CBC story that illustrates the difficulties this rule creates:

MD rejected for immigration because daughter could burden medicare
October 27, 2008, CBC News

A Calgary critical-care doctor's application for permanent residency has been rejected because one of his daughters might be a drain on the health care system.

South African physician Stanley Muwanguzi says his 22-year-old daughter has been institutionalized since she was a toddler and he has no intention of moving her to Canada.

"It has been a nightmare.... [That] this is happening in Canada is truly shameful. That is the only way to put it," he said.

Muwanguzi, who works at the Peter Lougheed Hospital, has been practising in Canada since 2002.

A letter from the government sent to Muwanguzi says he doesn't meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.

The letter says that under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a "person whose health condition, severe developmental delay associated with cerebral palsy, might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demand on health or social services," is inadmissible to Canada.

Since Muwanguzi's "non-accompanying family member is inadmissible to Canada," he is also "inadmissible."

Muwanguzi, who is in Canada on a temporary foreign worker permit, has appealed the determination.

A spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada said Muwanguzi's case is complicated and moving along as quickly as possible.

"Once the reviews are done and the people are consulted that have to be consulted, and that includes medical officers and whatnot, then a decision will be rendered. It would be my hope that that decision will occur sooner rather than later," Rob Ferguson said.

Doctor son also wants to immigrate

Muwanguzi said if he doesn't receive an answer soon, he will have to move to the United States.
Wendy Danson, his lawyer, said Canada needs doctors like Muwanguzi. His son in South Africa, another practising doctor, would also like to move here, she said.

"Here we have someone so skilled, who has a son equally as skilled that would join him in a flash. There is no logic behind it."

Muwanguzi, a father of five, has two daughters living with him and his wife, Susan, a teacher in Calgary, as well as two sons living in South Africa. One of his daughters is a pre-med student at the University of Alberta and is paying high international student fees of about $30,000 a year.

The couple returns to South Africa once a year to visit their sons and their daughter with cerebral palsy, who isn't capable of recognizing them or even talking. (Cerebral palsy refers to a group of neurological disorders that affect control of movement and posture and that limit activity.)

Muwanguzi said it's wrong he is being rejected "because of the notion that my daughter would be a drain on the Canadian economic system."

"I told the Immigration [Department] very clearly that I didn't want to destabilize my daughter. She has been in the same institution since she was 18 months old.… They are looking after her very well," he said. "There is no reason to move her. It would actually be detrimental."
Dan Zuege, the medical director of critical care at Peter Lougheed Hospital, has written a letter of support for Muwanguzi.

"I am very supportive of Dr. Muwanguzi's appeal for landed immigrant status and I have no doubts as to his integrity and intentions surrounding the care of his daughter and his commitment to service within the Canadian health care system," he wrote.

8 Comments:

At 1:55 AM , Anonymous Pandu said...

This is the first time I have ever heard something like this in Canadian Immigration.

Please let me know if its happening only in Permanent residence appplications.

 
At 7:50 PM , Blogger <a href="mailto:info@entercanada.ca">Gianpaolo Panusa (Click to Email)</a> said...

Yes, this is primarily for permanent resident applications.

 
At 6:12 AM , Blogger ync said...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
At 10:15 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this just for resident applicants or for people trying to visit as well?????

 
At 2:22 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

My sister was asked to leave Canada because she failed to renew her student visa on time. Does that affect my chances? she is not a dependent and she had no criminal record, infact according to the exclusion order she is eligible to come back after a year

 
At 8:39 PM , Anonymous dale said...

This is shameful

 
At 3:46 PM , Blogger afs said...

Firstly, Mr. Panusa, thank you for your excellent and informative BLOG. Is there a way to initiate a re-evaluation of this bit of IRPA legislation? There are just too many innocent individuals having their lives destroyed by the vagueness and bureaucratic idiosyncracies of Canadian immigration. We too, inland spousal sponsorship for PR, submitted May, 2007 (I'm Canadian Citizen, my husband is from Italy)are facing similar situation where CIC has sent a letter saying my spouse's PR could be refused if his daughter, who is in custody of ex does not undergo medical exam, thus becoming inadmissible. We cannot force her to do it. My spouse has submitted signed declaration. However, in CIC's own website on Who is inadmissible, it clearly states IRPA exempts certain groups from the excessive demand assessment. These include family class sponsored spouses, common-law partners and their dependent children, and Convention refugees and their family members, protected persons and persons in similar circumstances and their family members.My best wishes to Dr. Muwanguzi.

 
At 7:45 PM , Blogger Krem said...

My name is Slamah Krem. I am grad student at university of Waterloo. I married and have three kids. I have three year living in Waterloo, ON.
I interested in applying for PR visa under skilled worker class. I have more than ten year as professional engineering and more than 4 year in teaching at university level. According to the system point, I believe I am qualifying for more than 76 points.
The only point that may be considered as an issue in my application is my oldest daughter (6years) case. She is diagnosed with a rare disease named as Propionic Acidemia. This is a genetic disorder makes the body unable to break down certain protein. As result her mussel became very flexible and she is unable to stand or talk clearly.
Her case is stable or even improved as she came to Canada. Her case is not transferable or makes any danger to public health. She is on continuous medication and low protein diet. The approximate cost of her medication is $60/month and the diet is about $200/month. She is followed by specialist at McMaster children hospital.
This disease is very rare and there are limited clinic around the world. There is no specialist at our home country and her low protein diet is not available at home country.
I am looking for your initial advice and assessment. Let me know your opinion.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home