Monday, June 08, 2009

Sponsorship and Medical Inadmissibility of a Family Member


Too often an immigration sponsorship application is rejected because a family member (whether accompanying the applicant or not) is deemed medically inadmissible. The test is whether the individual will or might reasonably cause excessive demands on the health care or social service system when that person arrives in Canada.

A recent case at the Immigation Appeal Division (Leonoff, March 31, 2009) dealt with an applicant's brother who suffered from a mental disability (the case uses the unpleasant term of "retardation").

The IAD overturned the visa officer's rejection of the application and found the brother was not medically inadmissible. The IAD stated in part:

The sponsored application for permanent residence of the appellant's parents and brother was refused on the basis that the brother was medically inadmissible in that he suffered from severe mental retardation. The appeal was allowed in law. In response to a fairness letter, the appellant submitted further medical information to counter the position taken by the medical officer that the brother's condition might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demands on health or social services. That information included letters from a psychiatrist and psychologist indicating that the brother suffered from moderate mental retardation and could be cared for at home with minimal help. It behooved the medical officer to at least indicate why he rejected their conclusions, which were different from his. There was no indication that the visa officer considered the new evidence in rejecting the applications and he failed to consider whether the medical officer’s decision had ignored evidence and was unreasonable. If that had been done, the results of the present appeal may very well have been different, as there was no reliable evidence as to what kind of services the appellant really needed and there were insufficient humanitarian and compassionate grounds to grant special relief. The refusal was invalid in law.

In other words, there was an assumption that a mental disability would prove to be burdensome on our health care system without actually investigating the facts in this case where the brother could be cared for at home with little medical intervention required.

Immigration applicants who have medical issues, or who have family members with medical issues, should be vigilent about assumptions around the amount of care required. They should voice their opinion that their medical condition can be managed without excessive demands on the health care system if possible.


5 Comments:

At 7:30 PM , Blogger Joanna said...

You mentioned that "They should voice their opinion that their medical condition can be managed without excessive demands on the health care system if possible." How and what should the family of medical appeal cases voice out? Often, the landed immigrants find themselves working in Canada and hope that their loved ones can reunite with them. How else can the family appeal on humanitarian grounds?

 
At 10:16 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Based on my experience I would say there is no humanitarian grounds considered when it comes to excessive demands on health. Its just an eye wash for people.

Its highly unfair of not allowing families to reunite just because one member of the family has some medical problem.There should be some consideration based on the situation. They only need skilled and productive people to slog for the country. thats the bottom line.

 
At 12:43 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You mentioned that Immigration applicants who have medical issues, or who have family members with medical issues, should be vigilent about assumptions around the amount of care required. They should voice their opinion that their medical condition can be managed without excessive demands on the health care system if possible.

Unfortunately, by the time, our rejection letter came in (because of our child's condition - high functioning autism) it was too late. The child specialist in my country who tried to be enthusiastically helpful in their report to secure support for my son in Canada, painted a very extended support system my child needs. As a result we were refused a temporary visitor visa to reside in Canada for a couple of years. The doctor later tried to clarify the required support was not as extensive as the visa immigration officer envisioned, but to no avail.

Is there room for appeal?

 
At 12:02 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi
I am the primary applicant for the Federal Skilled worker category and my husband has recently been admitted in hospital for short period for a brief psychotic episode
Can u please suggest me if my application would be accepted or not and what should i do in order to be accepted?

 
At 3:51 PM , Blogger Khaled said...

Hi
I am in the stage of medical exam, I have a 1 year 3 month blind daughter since birth, does this mean I will be inadmissible

 

Post a Comment

<< Home